A man holds a burning poster of Libyan strongman Muammar Gaddafi in Benghazi, Libya, in March 2011
That speculation arose from a Sept. 29 article by Italian daily Corriere della Sera looking into recent claims by former Libyan official Mahmoud Jibril. Jibril—an opposition leader who served as prime minister for Libya’s transitional government—told Egypt’s Dream TV Sept. 26 that “a foreign agent had been infiltrated into the revolutionary brigades to kill Col. Gaddafi”, who at the time was on the run in western Libya. The Italian report goes on to quote an unidentified European diplomat arguing the assassination-bent spy had to be French—noting France and its then-President Nicolas Sarkozy had much to lose if Gaddafi had been allowed to go public with their secret dealings.
Why would France be more vulnerable than other nations that also dealt with Libya under the unsavory Gaddafi? In large part due to Sarkozy’s formerly cozy relationship with the Libyan. Just three months into his presidency, Sarkozy convinced Gaddafi to release five Bulgarian health workers imprisoned for years in Libya on what were considered bogus charges they’d intentionally infected children with HIV. That bargain took place amid murky financial and diplomatic transactions. Later, Sarkozy hosted Gaddafi during a high profile state visit to Paris—a trip that was supposed serve as the reformed Libyan’s return to polite global company, but which turned into an embarrassing fiasco for France. That was when the pair’s friendship began to sour, ending entirely when Sarkozy spearheaded the NATO operation that resulted in Gaddafi’s ouster. It was during those hostilities that Gaddafi intimates repeatedly aired claims the dictator had provided illegal funds to finance Sarkozy’s 2007 presidential campaign. Sarkozy has steadfastly denied those charges, though they continued to dog him.
But even if Paris may have had motives for taking Gaddafi out, did it also have the means and opportunity? Perhaps so, according to the British paper Daily Telegraph. On Sept. 30 it published a story quoting the former head of rebel intelligence services stating Syria helped France locate Gaddafi to his final hiding place. According to the story, Syrian president Assad offered to give Sarkozy the secret satellite phone number of his friend and fellow tyrant Gaddafi in exchange for Paris letting up on Damascus’s attempts to violently smother its own domestic uprising.
Under this theory, rather than stumbling upon Gaddafi cowering in a concrete drainpipe in Sirte, Libyan rebels were directed to the area once French intelligence had tracked Gaddafi down via his satellite phone. In the chaos surrounding his capture, shots were fired that ended the dictator’s life—though even cell phone video taken of the scene doesn’t reveal who actually killed the bloodied despot.
Doubts about who did may grow further still with new preceding the reports crediting a French intelligence operative. On Sept. 25 the young Libyan rebel fighter many people considered the person responsible for Gaddafi’s capture and killing died in a Paris hospital, from injuries suffered during his July abduction by Gaddafi loyalists. All new developments concerning Gaddafi’s last days and minutes seem to only raise new questions about exactly who brought them to an end.
Credit:http://newsfeed.time.com